|
Submitted by__________Tim
Erwin_____________________________
Date_________________10-06-05______________________________
Title (optional)_________Technology
Instructor___________________
Action
Research
University School
Action Research: I am in the third year of a three year study of
adjusting my curriculum and teaching methods to increase the mastery
level of our students in the area of Technology and to align our school
curriculum with both state standards and the technology expectations of
the local college. I have discussed with the
College Computer Science Department
what technology skills they
would like incoming students to have with. After examining the study’s first
two year results I have
adjusted my curriculum where needed and have
prepared a pre-test / post-test to cover all of the areas discussed. I
have given my Technology I students the pre-test to get a picture of
their skill levels in technology entering the class. I will give a
post-test to evaluate strengths and weaknesses in my program and to
measure the student’s mastery level of the material at the end of the
course.
Action Research Goals:
Goals
for my research include:
·
Confirming curriculum alignment to Tennessee State
Standards
·
Alignment of curriculum to meet local college technology
expectations for enrolling student.
·
Increase the percentage of students who score at the
mastery level of 75% or higher on the Technology skills Assessment
Question:
Is the current Technology
curriculum and my teaching style successful in helping our students
reach a 75% or above mastery level in the areas of technology they need
for both high school and college?
Subjects:
My subject area is
Technology Level One.
Procedures:
·
Give Pre-Test to find current knowledge level of students
in class.
·
Work with students to increase Technology knowledge to
level of college expectations.
·
Give Post-Test to evaluate student mastery levels and the
success level of current curriculum and teaching methods. A score of 75%
or above is mastery level on skills test
·
Make changes in curriculum and teaching methods where
weakness is found.
Results:
Year One: 2004 - 2005
Upon completion of year one of my three year study I have
found my curriculum and teaching methods to be on target. The test
results show that our curriculum is aligned with both state standards
and with the expectations of area colleges. My students entering this
year in Technology Level One all scored below mastery level on the
Pre-Test. Upon completing the Post-Test the class showed a gain of
82.6%. Nineteen out of Twenty-three students scored at mastery level. I
have attached a graph showing percent gain in proficiency.
Year Two: 2005 – 2006
My students entering this year in Technology Level One all
scored below mastery level on the Pre-Test.
Conclusions:
Recommendations:
|