reference room pilot project compliance audit enhancement plan
 
 
 
 

 

Impetus for change | Components of the new requirements | Goals for the Accreditation Review Project | Pilot institutions | ETSUs distinct addition to the pilot

Impetus for change

Approximately 2½ years ago, the Commission on Colleges, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) began a critique of accreditation criteria that were established in the 1980s and added to over the years. Their analysis was that the present numerous and redundant criteria, 450+ "must" statements, were restrictive with little or no flexibility for its member institutions in representing their unique missions. Further, it was their opinion that the process was time intensive and resulted in excessive paperwork with a poor cost/benefit ratio. Adding to their thorough review of the criteria were changes in marketplace (distance learning) that would necessitate adding to the "must" statements in order to ascertain if institutions were meeting these new challenges.
The Commission's Accreditation Review Project represents a conceptual shift from externally mandated, prescribed criteria. This is the first major change in SACS accreditation in fifteen years. Inherent in this new process is accountability to the higher education community, students, and other various publics. The intent of the Commission on Colleges is not to homogenize institutions, but to emphasize improvement while taking into account the institution's mission and commitment to improvement. The new process allows for differences while assuring quality. The new accreditation requirements shift the emphasis from requiring an institution to meet the 450+ "must" statements to leading an institution toward greater accountability and responsibility in assuring quality of programs. Clearly, the new elements place greater responsibility with the institution for demonstrating its commitment. Institutions will provide evidence to the public, the legislatures of the states, the federal government, and the institutions under review themselves that institutions can demonstrate accountability. The paradigm shift pointedly focuses institutions on assuring and maintaining quality enhancements supportive of distinctive institutional missions. The new requirements will replace current comprehensive and alternative self-studies and the peer review processes therein.
 

 

 

 

reference room | pilot project | compliance audit | enhancement plan
search | contact | home
East Tennessee State University
alphabetical site index
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O
P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
© 2001 East Tennessee State University
Johnson City, TN 37614