Spectrum 2007-2008

Policies and Regulations
TN Board of Regents
State University
and Community College
System of Tennessee
Institutional
Student Disciplinary Rules
0240-3-2-.05 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
- Tennessee Uniform
Administrative Procedures Act
- All cases which may
result in suspension or expulsion of a student or revocation of
registration of a student organization during the term of the
registration are subject to the contested case provision of the Tennessee
Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (TUAPA) and shall be processed in
accordance with the uniform contested case procedures adopted by the
Board of regents unless the student waives those procedures in writing
and elects to have his or her case disposed of in accordance with
institutional procedures established by these rules.
- All cases which are
reviewed under the uniform contested case provisions adopted by the Board
of Regents pursuant to the TUAPA shall be within the jurisdiction of the
University Judicial Committee as described in section (3) below but shall
nevertheless be reviewed pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Board
pursuant to the TUAPA, including, but not limited to, interim suspensions
and appeals.
- Institutional
Administrative Procedures
- Determination of
Procedure to be Used
- A disciplinary case
involving violations of university regulations or infringements upon
student rights may be reviewed under Institutional Administrative
Procedures or may be referred to the appropriate judicial board for
review under Institutional Judicial Procedures, as determined by the
appropriate university official.
- The university
official who shall determine whether an alleged violation of university
regulations shall be processed under the Institutional Administrative
Procedures or the Institutional Judicial Procedures is as follows:
- The Director of
Housing, Assistant Director of Housing, Area Coordinators, or Apartment
Managers, where the alleged violation is of the regulations of the
Residence Hall Association (RHA).
- The Director of
Student Activities, where the alleged violation is of the regulations
of the Inter-Fraternity Council (IFC), the Panhellenic
Council (PC), or the Pan-Hellenic Council (PC).
- The Associate Vice
President and Dean of Students, where the alleged violation is of
university regulations other than those of the RHA, the IFC or the PC.
- Determinations of
which procedures shall be utilized for processing an alleged violation
of university regulations shall be at the discretion of the appropriate
university official; provided, however, the relationship between the
hearing officer and the accused student must be one which is free from
duress or coercion, and is a relationship which is objective and
conducive to the purpose of an administrative hearing.
- If a student chooses
to admit to a violation of law or university regulations, the student
may request that the sanction be imposed by the appropriate university
official. At this hearing, the student may present witnesses and other
evidence relevant to the offense that may mitigate in the student's
favor.
- The hearing officer
has the authority to impose the same disciplinary sanction as the appropriate
judicial board would have under section (3)(d)
below.
- The Associate Vice
President and Dean of Students or his/her designee is authorized to hear
under the Institutional Administrative Procedures all cases of alleged
misconduct of students from April 15 through September 15 of each year
if judicial boards are not functioning.
- Description of
Institutional Administrative Procedures
- The hearing officer
in cases held under Institutional Administrative Procedures shall be as
follows:
- The Director of Housing,
Assistant Director of Housing, Area Coordinators, or Apartment Manager
where the alleged violation is of the Residence Hall Association (RHA).
- The Director of
Student Activities, where the alleged violation is of regulations of
the Inter-Fraternity Council, the Panhellenic
Council, or the Pan-Hellenic Council (PC).
- The Associate Vice
President and Dean of students, where the alleged violation is of
university regulations other than those of the RHA, the IFC, or the
PCS.
- Due process
procedures shall be observed in all administrative hearings under
Institutional Administrative Procedures.
- The student rights
set forth in section (4)(b) below shall not be
denied.
- The hearing officer
has the authority to impose the same disciplinary sanction as the
appropriate judicial board would have under section (3) (d) below.
- Appeals Under
Institutional Administrative Procedures
- Cases heard by the
Director of Housing or the Director of Student Activities may be
appealed to the Associate Vice President and Dean of students or
his/her designee.
- Cases heard by the
Associate Vice President and Dean of students may be appealed to the
Vice Provost and Chief Student Affairs Officer.
- Institutional
Judicial Procedures
- Purpose of the
Judiciary. The purpose of Institutional Judicial Procedures shall be to
provide fair and just treatment in cases involving either violation of
university regulations or infringements upon students' rights, and to
take appropriate measures for those found guilty. In all cases, due process
shall be observed.
- Components of the
Judiciary. The Judiciary of East Tennessee State University shall consist
of the following components:
- The University
Judicial Committee shall be the highest court authorized by the
university president.
- The Student Court
shall be the next highest court within the student judicial system.
- The Residence Hall
Association Judicial Board, the Inter-Fraternity Judicial Board, the Panhellenic Judicial Board and the Pan-Hellenic
Judiciary Committee shall each be lower courts within the student
judicial system.
- Composition and
Selection of the Courts. The composition of the University Judiciary
Courts shall be as follows:
- The University
Judicial Committee shall be composed of the Associate Vice President and
Dean of Students, President of the Student Government Association (SGA),
Chief Justice of SGA, an Associate Justice, and three faculty.
Alternates for the chief justice and associate justice shall be selected
by the SGA to hear cases on appeal from the Student Court.
- The Student Court
shall be composed of a chief justice and seven (7) associate justices,
one of whom shall be designated to serve as the alternate chief justice.
Each member shall be appointed by the SGA president and confirmed by a
majority of the Student Senate present and voting.
- The Residence Hall
Association Judicial Board, the Inter-Fraternity Judicial Board, the Panhellenic Judicial Board and the Pan-Hellenic
Judiciary Committee shall each be composed of those persons designated
by the constitutions of those respective bodies.
- Powers and
Limitations. The relative powers of the components of the Judiciary are
as follows:
- The University
Judicial Committee shall exercise the highest judicial authority on
campus, next to that of the Vice Provost and Chief Student Affairs
Officer and the University President or his designee. This committee's
authority shall include the right to suspend or expel a student. The
University President reserves the right to uphold or reverse any
decision made by any judicial body.
- The next highest
judicial authority shall be vested in the Student Court. All sanctions, with
the exception of suspension and expulsion, are available to the Student Court.
- The Residence Hall
Association, the Inter-Fraternity Council, the Panhellenic
Council, and the Pan-Hellenic Council shall provide, through their
respective constitutions, the powers and limitations of their respective
judicial boards, all of which shall be subordinate to the Student Court.
- Operation of the
Courts. All cases that enter the University Judiciary shall be
administered through the appropriate channels:
- Any member of the
university community may file a complaint against any student for
misconduct. Complaints shall be prepared in writing and directed to the
Associate Vice President and Dean of Students. A complaint should be
submitted as soon as possible after the event takes place, preferably
within ten (10) days of the alleged misconduct.
- Violations of
official university regulations other than regulations of the RHA, the
IFC, or the PCS shall be reported directly to the Associate Vice
President and Dean of Students, who shall direct that the case be
reviewed under the Institutional Administrative Procedures or referred
to the appropriate judicial board.
- Violations of the
internal standards of the Residence Hall Association (RHA), the
Inter-Fraternity Council (IFC), the Panhellenic
Council (PC), or the Pan-Hellenic Council (PC) shall be reported to the
authorities designated in their respective constitutions.
- The RHA authorities
shall report the case to the housing office, where the director of
housing shall either direct that the case be reviewed under the
Institutional Administrative Procedures or referred to the residence
Hall Judicial Board.
- The IFC-PC
authorities shall report the case to the Director of Student
Activities, who shall either direct that the case be reviewed under
the Institutional Administrative Procedures or referred to the
Inter-Fraternity Judicial Board, the Panhellenic
Judicial Board or the Pan-Hellenic Judiciary Committee.
- Violations of the
Student Government Constitution or Code of Laws shall be reported to
the Student Government Vice President, who shall refer the case to the
Associate Vice President and Dean of Students. The Associate Vice
President and Dean of Students shall direct that the case be heard by
the Student Court.
- All judicial
decisions must be reported in writing to the Associate Vice President
and Dean of Students within two (2) class days from such time as the decision
has been reached.
- The circumstances
surrounding all cases handled by the University Judiciary shall be
confidential.
- The official records
of all cases shall be maintained by the Student Affairs office.
- All official
correspondence concerning the decision of a judicial board, court, or
committee shall be executed by the Associate Vice President and Dean of
Students or his/her designated representative except in cases involving
interpretation of the Student Government Constitution or Code of Laws. The
Chief Justice of the Student
Court shall make written report of the
decision and the circumstances surrounding it, taking care to exclude
any information of a personal nature, to the secretary of Legislative
Affairs.
- All hearings by the
judicial boards, court, or committee shall be held in closed session
unless otherwise requested by the defendant.
- All subsequent
hearings concerning readmission of students or reinstatement of
organizational charters shall be initiated through the Associate Vice
President and Dean of Students or his/her designated representative.
- Jurisdiction of the
Courts
- Each judicial board
or court may serve as a court of original jurisdiction.
- The University
Judicial Committee shall hear those cases involving a student who is
accused of violating general university regulations and who, if found
guilty, may be subject to suspension or expulsion from the institution,
and other cases deemed appropriate by the Associate Vice President and
Dean of Students.
- The Student Court
shall have original jurisdiction in those cases involving alleged
violations of general university regulations which do not warrant
suspension or expulsion. The Student Court shall also hear those cases
involving alleged violations of the Student Government Constitution or
Code of Laws, and any other cases deemed appropriate by the Associate
Vice President and Dean of Students.
- The Chief Justice
shall be chairman of the Student
Court and preside over all meetings and
hearings. The Chief Justice shall direct and be responsible for the
performance of all duties and functions of the Student Court and its justices.
The alternative chief justice shall execute the powers and duties of the Chief Justice in the latter's
absence or incapacity to serve.
- The justices of the
student court shall determine in all cases brought before them all
decisions which are within the court's jurisdiction as prescribed by
the SGA Constitution. Five (5) justices of the Student Court shall constitute a
quorum to do business. Each justice shall have (1) vote, with the
Chief Justice voting only to break a tie.
- The justices of the
Student Court
shall, by majority vote, determine rules of procedure for the Student Court,
except as otherwise prescribed by the SGA Constitution or By-Laws.
- The Student Court
shall have the power to request any member of the student body, a
representative from any campus organization, or any faculty member or
administrator to appear before the court, provided that the
subpoena/request is issued in writing at least five (5) days prior to
the appearance.
- The Residence Hall
Judicial Board shall have the original jurisdiction in cases involving
violation of Housing regulations, standards established by its
constitution, and any other cases referred to it by the director of housing.
- The Inter-Fraternity
Judicial Board or the Panhellenic Judicial
Board shall have original jurisdiction only in cases involving
violations of regulations specified in the Inter-Fraternity and Panhellenic Constitution and By-Laws.
- The Pan-Hellenic Judiciary
Committee shall have original jurisdiction only in cases involving
violations specified in the Pan-Hellenic Constitution and By-Laws.
- Appeals
- All cases may be
appealed by the student or organization in question to the next higher
judicial authority in accordance with the Appeal Procedures provided
below. The right to appeal
to the next judicial authority shall be afforded only to the accused.
- Final university
appeal shall be to the University President.
- Appeal Procedures
- If the accused desires
to appeal, a statement of reasons for appealing must be forwarded to
the Associate Vice President and Dean of Students or his designee. This
statement must be filed within three (3) days following receipt by the
accused of a copy of the decision being appealed.
- The statement of
reasons for appeal will be forwarded to the appropriate appeal board or
officer, which will set a date for reviewing the case and notify the
accuser.
- The appeal board or
officer, upon reviewing the case, will have several options. The
original decision may be affirmed or reversed. In cases where the
original action is inappropriate as a result of issues involved in the
appeal, the appeal board or officer may revert the case back to the
original board or hearing officer, modify the original action, or hold
a completely new hearing.
The accuser will be notified of the outcome, a permitted under Tennessee law.
- Special
Provisions Applicable to Both Institutional Administrative Procedures
and Institutional Judicial Procedures
a.
Failure to Appear. If the accused student fails to
appear at the scheduled hearing or provide adequate notice of excuse, the
hearing officer or court may:
1.
Reset a formal hearing of the case for the next
scheduled meeting.
2.
Dispose of the case in whatever manner it deems just
based upon available information.
b.
Hearing Guidelines
1.
At least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the hearing
the accused student is entitled to written notification of the time and place
of the hearing and of his rights as outlined below.
2.
At least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the hearing
the accused student is entitled to a written statement of the charges in
sufficient detail as to enable the student to prepare a case, including how the
alleged violation came to the attention of the university.
3.
All administrative hearings and hearings of judicial
bodies will be closed, except to the accused, his/her advisor, the accuser,
his/her advisor, the hearing officer, and members of the judicial board.
Witnesses may also appear upon request of the hearing officer, the judicial
board, the accused, or the accuser.
4.
In hearings involving more than one accused student,
the chairperson of the judicial body, in his or her discretion, may permit the
hearings concerning each student to be conducted separately.
5.
In cases heard by a judicial board, the accused student
may question the ability of a judicial member to render an impartial judgment
and may request the member's removal at that time. The judicial board will rule
on the request. If any members of a judicial board feel that their relationship
with either the case or the individuals involved would affect their ability to
render an impartial judgment, they may disqualify themselves.
6.
The complainant and the accused have the right to be
assisted by any advisor they choose, at their own expense. The advisor may be
an attorney. The accused is responsible for presenting his or her own case and advisors are not permitted to speak or to
participate directly in any hearing before a judicial body.
7.
The university, the accused and the judicial body shall
have the privilege of presenting witnesses, subject to the right of questioning
by the judicial body.
8.
Pertinent records, exhibits and written statements may
be accepted as evidence for consideration by a judicial body at the discretion
of the chairperson.
9.
The accused student is entitled to ask questions of the
hearing officer, of the judicial board, and of any witnesses called before the
administrative or judicial hearings.
10. Hearings
shall proceed in the following order:
- Reading of the charges
- The student's
denial or admission of the charges
- Presentation of
evidence by the university and questions by the student charged
and/or the hearing body
- Presentation of evidence
by the student charged and questions by the university and/or the
hearing body, and
- Closing statement
by both parties
11. After
the hearing, the judicial body shall determine (by majority vote if the
judicial body consists of more than one person) whether the student has
violated each section of the Student Code of Conduct which the student is
charged with violating.
12. The
judicial body's determination shall be made on the basis of whether it is
"more likely than not" that the accused student violated the Student
Code of Conduct.
13. The
student shall be notified in writing of the decision within five (5) days of
the judicial body's decision. Every attempt will be made to verbally notify the
student of the decision prior to the five-day period. In cases involving
alleged sexual assault, both the accused and accuser shall be notified in
writing within five (5) days of the judicial body's decision.
14. There
shall be a single record, such as minutes or a tape recording, of all hearings
before a judicial body. The record shall be the property of the university.
15. Any
question of interpretation regarding the Student Code of Conduct shall be
referred to the Vice Provost and Chief Student Affairs Officer or his designee
for final determination.
- Victim's Rights
Some actions that violate the university regulations
involve victimization of one or more students by another student(s). This
behavior may include acts of theft or damage to property, physical
violence, and other acts that endanger the safety of others in the
university community. If a student has filed a complaint and is
identified as a victim, that student is entitled to certain rights during
the disciplinary process.
If
a charge is filed with the appropriate judicial official, it is important
to remember that the accused student is being charged with violating a
university rule or regulation. Although a victim's input may be sought
during the disciplinary process, the ultimate disposition of the case
rests with the university. If a victim withdraws his or her complaint
during the course of the disciplinary proceeding, the university reserves
the right to proceed with the case on the basis of evidence other than
the testimony of the victim.
During
the course of a disciplinary proceeding, victims have the following
rights:
- To meet with the
appropriate judicial officer to discuss the disciplinary process.
- To submit a written
account of the alleged incident.
- To be advised of the
date, time and location of the disciplinary hearing, and to request
rescheduling of the hearing for good cause.
- To be accompanied by
an advisor of the victim's choosing during the hearing process, although
the advisor will not be permitted to speak for the victim during the
hearing.
- To testify as a
witness during the hearing.
- To decline to
testify, with knowledge that such action could result in dismissal of
the university's charges for lack of evidence.
- To submit a written
impact statement to the hearing panel for consideration during the sanctioning
phase of the disciplinary process.
- Cases of alleged
sexual assault. In cases involving alleged sexual assault, both the
accuser and the accused shall be informed of the following:
- Both the accuser and the accused are entitled to
the same opportunity to have others present during a disciplinary
proceeding.
- Both the accuser and the accused shall be
informed of the outcome of any disciplinary proceeding involving
allegations of sexual assault.
- General Policies On Student Organizations.
- The purpose of these
provisions is to create a set of uniform expectations for all student
organizations registered at ETSU regarding social behavior on or off
campus. In this context, student organization activities should be
conducted with regard to the rights and safety of other members of the
community. The role of student organizations within ETSU's
academic community should be to provide students an opportunity to meet
with their peers and faculty in a relaxed setting. This interaction
should serve to enhance the campus learning environment by providing
students an opportunity to develop leadership and social skills and to
apply classroom work to life experiences.
- All disciplinary rules
and regulations concerning individual students shall apply to student
organizations and are incorporated by reference. This shall include
compliance with all local, state or federal laws.
- The university shall
not be responsible for injuries or damages to persons or property
resulting from the activities of student organizations, or for any debts
or disabilities of such organizations.
- Student organizations
are vicariously liable for the conduct and action of each member and
invited guest of the organization while acting in the capacity of a
member or while attending or participating in any activity of the
organization.
- All student
organizations shall be registered with the university prior to engaging
in any organizational activity.
(See TBR Policy 3:01:01:00) In addition, Greek letter social
organizations are required to be members of one of the Greek governing
councils on campus.
- Definitions
- A "student
organizational function" is any meeting, event, banquet or program
for social, educational, recreational, cultural or spiritual purpose(s)
planned and/or attended by members and/or their invited guests.
- An "open"
activity is a function generally accessible to persons in the campus or
community at large without regard to affiliation or association with the
sponsoring organization.
- An "invited
guest" is one who has received an invitation to attend a function
from an identifiable member of the sponsoring organization. An
announcement of general circulation to the campus or community at-large
is not considered to be an invitation.
- Student Organizational
Functions.
- All student
organizational functions involving the serving or consumption of alcohol
shall be registered with the Student
Organization Resource Center
at least (7) business days prior to the date of the function. (See
Procedures for Student Organization Events with alcohol-available in the
Student Organization Resource
Center.) When
functions are to take place in university-owned, leased or controlled
property, policies concerning use of that property should be consulted
and must be complied with.
- Student organization
functions where alcohol will be present are limited to houses owned by
social fraternities recognized by ETSU and commercial establishments
owned by licensed and insured third-party vendors. Third party vendor
locations are subject to administrative approval.
- Possession, sale, use
and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages during a student
organizational function must be in compliance with applicable federal,
state, and local laws and university rules. It is the responsibility of
the sponsoring student organization to ensure that individuals under 21
years of age do not consume alcoholic beverages.
- Alcoholic beverages
are permitted at functions only on a "bring your own bottle"
basis or through a contract with a licensed server at a commercial
establishment and shall not be made available on a self-serve basis.
That is, students attending functions shall not have open and unlimited
access to alcoholic beverages.
- Open parties where
alcohol is present are prohibited.
- Possession, sale, use
and/or consumption of any illegal drug or controlled substances at any
student organizational function is prohibited.
- Any student
organizational function at which alcohol is present must have a minimum
of two (2) bonded security guards present at the site of the function.
- On an annual basis by
August 1st, all social fraternities with houses are required to submit a
current report from the fire marshal approving the house for occupancy
and specifying the capacity limits of the facility, including the
capacity limits of public areas. The report must be submitted in writing
to the Coordinator of Greek Life. Attendance at student organization
functions must be restricted to the facility's public areas. The
capacity limits of the public areas are determined by the fire marshal. In houses of social fraternities
recognized by ETSU, attendance at student organization functions with
alcohol will not exceed two (2) invited quests for each active
organization member, regardless of the capacity of the facility.
- Complaints about a
student organization shall be brought to the attention of the Director of
Student Activities. Mediation among parties may result or disciplinary
charges may be referred to the ETSU judicial system for hearing.
- Student Organization
Sanctions. Any registered student organization may be subject to the
following disciplinary sanctions, as listed here and defined in section
0240-3-2-.04. Disciplinary sanctions: warning, reprimand, restitution,
community service, constructive or educational project, restriction,
probation, suspension of registration, withdrawal of registration. These
sanctions may be imposed either singly or in combination, and such action
will be taken only pursuant to disciplinary procedures established by
these rules.
Statutory Authority: T.C.A.
Section 49-8-203