A A A


POSITIVE/NEGATIVE 24
ANNUAL JURIED ART EXHIBITION
February 2 to 20, 2009
Slocumb Galleries, ETSU
Juror: Pradip Malde



Created with flickr slideshow.


BEST OF SHOW
KATHY HALPER


HONORABLE MENTION
ROGER JONES  
ALLISON KLUTENKAMPER
JAYOUNG YOON


PARTICIPATING ARTISTS

WILLIAM PITTMAN ANDREWS  wpa@ra.msstate.edu
CHRISTIE BLIZZARD & STEVE PAGE christie.blizard@ttv.edu
DAVID BROUSSARD   dmbrousse@gmail.com
DEREK BUCKNER   derek.buckner@gmail.com
LAURA CHENICEK   Lchenicek@bellsouth.com
JOSHUA CROSS   jcross10@carolina.rr.com
SHANE DARWENT   shanedarwent@gmail.com
CARRIE DYER   carr.edyer@gmail.com
MARK GORDON   mgordon@barton.edu
KATHY HALPER   kathy@halper.com
PERRY JOHNSON   perry@perryjohnson.net
ROGER JONES   jonesart@gmail.com
ALLISON KLUTENKAMPER  aklutenkamper@me.com
BRIAN PAULSEN   brian_paulsen@und.nodak.edu
MARIE PORTERFIELD  marieporterfield@gmail.com
LYNDA RAY   lyndrayart@gmail.com
ROBERT REPINSKI   rrepinsk@d.umn.edu
AMANDA RICHARDSON  starla1_@hotmail.com
RYLAN STEELE   rylansteele@gmail.com
BARBARA ECKHART WALTON  bwalton@iastate.edu
JAYOUNG YOON   fado79@hotmail.com
LALLA ZIMA   gczima@aol.com



JUROR'S STATEMENT

        Just as artists symbolize themselves through their work, jurors,  curators, gallerists, and collectors symbolize themselves via the  artists they select and attend to. In other words, there is a complex  intertwining between the ‘self’ and the material world, and the ‘self’  and the societal. Even the title of the exhibition, ‘Positive /  Negative 24’, symbolizes this intertwining process. The artists in  this exhibition traverse a zone that folds from the extremely  personal  to the political to the satirical, but this tendency results at least  in part from a combination of their interests meshing with those of  the juror. This intertwining of expression and interest raises  questions about artistic output, such as at what point does the  expressive process stop, and is authorship really as singular and  personal as is generally believed?

       
        If the boundaries between the individual artist, passionately working away in the studio to express her or himself and (in this case) the call for proposals, the juror, the gallery, the viewer are all blurred and considered as being profoundly intertwined, then whose expression, whose creation is any given work of art? Or to consider it another way, who is responsible for it? And to whom or what is this complex artistic effort responsible to?


        Michael Ignatieff, in a reprint from “Articles of Faith” published in the May, 1996 issue of the Index on Censorship, wrote that “the truth that matters to people is not factual truth but moral truth; not a narrative that tells what happened but a narrative that explains why it happened and who is responsible... truth is related to identity. What you believe to be true depends, in some measure on who you believe yourself to be. And who you believe yourself to be is mostly defined in terms of who you are not.”


        I believe that an artist’s greatest challenge and calling is to make impassioned work while being aware of the complex societal intertwining of the expressive and creative process. This kind of an approach inevitably brushes with concerns related to truth, morality, and identity, of the kind that Ignatieff writes about. It places responsibility of expression not just on the artist, but also on the other players in a process that may ultimately bring any given body of work into the public realm. The works in the exhibition have been selected, as best I could, with these thoughts in mind. Many artists were not selected, and to them, I apologize for my limited vision and lack of correspondence with their interests. To all who submitted work, I thank you for your endeavors and commitment.



Pradip Malde

January, 2009