skip to main content columnskip to left navigation

Appalachian Student Research Forum

Office of Research and Sponsored Programs

Abstract Tips

Tips on what NOT to do when writing an Abstract

Here are a few comments from judges about past Forum abstracts, giving some ideas of what not to do:

  • no details given as to what methods were used to get their results

  • too jargon-heavy; use analogy or common comparison to make more understandable

  • need to define abbreviations

  • wordy; should use concise wording and not digress from question/methods/results

  • need to emphasize facts and what actually took place during the research; also, need to remove any speculative statements not founded in data

  • gave good background to show relevance, but much of abstract was background, i.e., not discussing their own work.

  • too much background info - more detail needed on actual study

  • grammatically, abstracts should be written in past impersonal voice (i.e., "it was found", not "we found")

  • this document does not appear to be abstracted content, but merely a list of what will be included in the presentation

  • can't tell what was actually done as part of this study (i.e., what was already done, and what the student/researcher did). Use clear language such as "this study examined such and such by doing such and such"

  • results unclear - more detail is needed

  • results unknown -- it was just stated that they will discuss the results during the presentation

  • needed more written to explain and define study--purpose, relevance. With such heavy jargon, need to describe model, rationale, and design more clearly

icon for left menu icon for right menu